It takes 20 years to construct a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about this, you’ll do things differently. -Warren Buffet
If more firms — namely online sportsbooks and casinos — followed this advice, gambling online would be far more enjoyable…and not as stressful.
I’d wager that BetOnline wishes they did. They have made decisions a few years back that’s probably cost them tens of thousands of thousands, possibly even millions of dollars, because of lost business from bad PR.
We’ll be sharing some examples of these with you in our review. Because while we wholeheartedly recommend BetOnline to our customers — and feel that now they are a trusted and legit gaming company — we think you have the right to know the whole story before deciding to play with here.
Stop by BetOnline
(US Customers Welcomed)
Key Information Website — BetOnline.agLaunched at 2004Licensed & Regulated in PanamaEmail — firstname.lastname@example.orgTelephone — 1-888-426-3661
Hit & Misses Fast payoutsDiverse payment optionsTrusted & reputable companyUS clients welcomedMobile casinoHigh rollover requirements
WHAT DID BETONLINE DO?
2019 MAIN REVIEW
CASINO & SKILL GAMES
First Things First: What Can BetOnline Do Exactly?
What just did BetOnline do to create so many people mad?
We think that a better question is this: what did not they do?
BetOnline’s poor choices spans the spectrum of shady behavior, which range from telling enjoys to withholding money to having shoddy security.
There are plenty of examples we could show you. However, LegitGamblingSites.com has already done the job for us. They uncovered several examples, which you can find for yourself on their BetOnline review.
Here is our TL;DR variant:
BetOnline Told a Fib
After BetOnline first introduced their poker merchandise, they lied about what network it was on. They first claimed to be on the Hero Poker Network, even though they were really about the Action Poker Network. There were stories about how they had been about the Chico Poker Network, but were kicked off.
Later reports (in BetOnline) suggested that things were nice and fixed, and that BetOnline was (and still is) about the Chico Poker Network.
Odd thing to like about, eh? (Though we might lie too if we were on a shoddy network such as Action.)
Everyone agrees that BetOnline lying was a stupid move and a bad way to advertise a new product. It doesn’t exude confidence. Plus it makes you wonderwhy would they lie about something so trivial in the first location?
$60,000 Confiscated for No Reason
There have already been many, MANY reports about BetOnline confiscating money from customers. The justification was almost always because the client allegedly cheated, although no proof was ever provided from BetOnline (from the cases we’ve read).
1 case that caught our attention was of a pro who had $60,000+ confiscated because BetOnline stated he cheated. They refused to send him all his palms, but did offer to send him the hand histories which revealed him jobless (for proof).
He got them though. What he did get was empty promises about the way they were on the road, and the runaround when they showed up. They eventually told him they couldn’t send him the hand histories since the documents were too large.
(Anyone who understands anything about online poker and hand histories — let alone about downloading files to your computer — understands what a crock that is. And, why wouldn’t you send proof someone cheated if you have nothing to hide?)
Eventually Sportsbook Review (SBR) got involved and helped the player get his money back. His final update mentions being alleviated about the way it worked out for himbut also said the same thing happened to his friend.
Chip Dumping $50 Means You Owe BetOnline $30,000+
In this case the player did do something wrong — he chip-dumped to his buddy. But here is the kicker:
He also chip-dumped to his buddy at a HEADS UP table at which no one else would be hurt. He did it his friend could have an additional $50 to play at BetOnline.
The humorous part is that they were playing from the exact same house at the time. Most sites wouldn’t even let two individuals from the exact same IP address sit down at exactly the same table — but BetOnline did.
The person had his account suspended (far after the fact, whereas many websites would’ve captured it much earlier ), which no disputes thinks was a wrong move on BetOnline’s part. What IS however, is how they wanted to also take his 37,000 he earned because that incident.
Forum members suggested that most legit websites would never have allowed two people from the same IP to sit in the same table. And, if they did, as soon as they guessed chip dumping had occurred, the participant’s account would come under inspection. He’d not have the chance to earn the $37,000.
But now that he did, BetOnline wanted it. But, technically, the money should go to whomever was hurt by this player’s activities (that wasn’t any one). So it’s ridiculous BetOnline believes they need to have the ability to retain it.
BetOnline Knows Your Own Passwords
The last example we want to share is an instance where a BetOnline rep outed how the employees knew their customer’s passwords and login amounts. You can see the live chat log in here.
The original poster has a fantastic point. If everybody in the company has access to your login information, what is stopping them from running a VPN, logging into accounts and accepting your money?
The BetOnline rep did not have a fantastic answer, just a”ha ha fine grained.”
Scary stuff. Scroll down the forum thread and you’ll see more examples. It is ridiculous.
What is even more absurd is the way these examples are a drop in the bucket compared to the sheer variety of (similar) complaints . A quick Google search for”BetOnline scams” will also keep you busy.
Then BetOnline Does Something Funny: They Acquire SportsBetting.ag
During precisely the exact same time BetOnline was struggling, SportsBetting.ag was struggling to. They were trying hard to pay their clients.
Thent a couple of months later a story broke — BetOnline obtained SportsBetting.ag.
The crazy part was not so much the purchase, it was the fact that BetOnline also agreed to be on the hook for all the current and past payouts. Even after all their stingy-like shenanigans.
An excerpt from SBR:
Most importantly, the new investment team is dedicated to get SportsBetting.ag winners compensated at a more expedited manner.
“The new shareholders unconditionally guarantee past and future payouts from SportsBetting.ag,” the rep stated. “However, since there is a large backlog of pending payouts, they have to be run through different fraud checks, fulfilled and guaranteed. When the backlog is complete, customers will experience radically enhanced payouts thanks in part to upgraded payment options, including same day choices.”
No one knows exactly how much BetOnline needed to make in past payments. In reality, BetOnline was reportedly”shocked” to find over $1.5 million in obligations that was not reported from the prior direction. So I think it would be safe to assume that the previous debts exceeded $1.5 million — and apparently BetOnline has paid it all off.
What Does That Mean for BetOnline in 2019? What Does That Mean for You?
Frankly, we’ve had difficulty finding anything negative to report about BetOnline from within the past year or so.
There are some complaints; ordinary stuff all businesses face that we’ll address later on in our inspection once it makes sense. But it looks to us like the majority of BetOnline’s issues are over.
They even have satisfied clients, if you’re able to believe it.
Now, what exactly does this mean to you? Should you forget and forgive? Are they safe enough for one to join, make a deposit and playwith? We will be honest — there is no way we would’ve played at BetOnline back in 2011-2012 if we’d known or heard about any of those reports above. Nobody in their right mind would. You’d be safer lighting your cash on fire.
And we also don’t wish to downplay the errors they’ve made. Lying, making baseless accusations, withholding funds and insecure applications isn’t to be taken lightly.
But since purchasing SportsBetting.ag and adding new management to manage operations, things have improved drastically. So much so we’re comfortable now recommending them to our readers.
And it is not only us. When you look at other BetOnline reviews, then you will see similar thought processes. In most cases the reviewers first condemned them for their activities (in 2011-2012) and advocated NOT playing there, only to have a change of heart once they saw just how much BetOnline altered.
So, here is where we stand on the matter —
BetOnline has made mistakes and is far from a perfect sportsbook, poker room or casino. They had and continue to have their shortcomings, the latest of which we highlight in our review under.
But, as best as we could tell, they have righted their wrongs and continue to improve on what they currently offer to players. So we feel safe using accounts here.
It’s your responsibility to decide if you feel the identical way.
2019 Main Review of BetOnline
Together with their past out of the way, let us jump into what is important now — and that’s what BetOnline offers concerning banking, gambling choices and promotions.
Deposit and Cash Out Options, Fees and Time Frames
BetOnline delivers a good selection of banking options. However, you’ll want to remember that what’s available for you will probably be determined by where you live.
Let us begin with their deposit choices.
Listed below are the payment methods BetOnline accepts and also the min/max limitations for each:
Visa (Person to Person)
Person to Person
$50/$900 — BetOnline covers some fees over $300. Money Orders
$10/no Maximum Neteller
$10/no Maximum Book to Book
Book to Book
$500/no max Bank Wire
$1,000/no max Check
Assess $1,500/$24,900 Diner’s Club
The biggest complaint about deposits are their 6% fees for debit and credit cards. They’re one of the only websites that charge for (credit/debit card) deposits. Bovada’s among the other kinds, charging 4.9 percent.
When you’re ready to cash out your winnings, then you can use:
Person to Person
$50/$500 — Can take 12-36 hours. Fees will run $26-$101. Bank Wire
$500/$24,900 — May take around ten days. Fees will run $45-$75. ATM
ATM Only Card
$100/$2,500. Check By Mail
Check by Mail, Courier or Express
$500/$2,500 — Depending on which option you pick, this can take 7-30 days and will cost you $25-$50 NOT INCLUDING the fees that your bank may charge. Bitcoin
$20/$5,000 — Will cost you 2% (of the total). Skrill
$25/$9,900 — Takes up to 36 hours. Only 3 requests allowed per week. Book to Book
Book to Book
$500/$15,000 — Transfers are completed within one day. Neteller
$25/$9,900 — Requires around 36 hours and will cost you $20. Only 3 payouts allowed per week.
What I don’t like is how you are going to pay a fee for every single banking option. Even bitcoin, which is usually free at most sportsbooks and casinos. But here you’ll pay a 2% commission.
That said, I have seen firsthand testimonials from customers who say they’ve received payments over 10 days, bank transfers over 3 days and bank wires in 2-3 days. This is fast considering they’re in the US marketplace.
BetOnline says nothing about it in their website, but I’ve seen reports that indicate BetOnline gives you a $50 charge every month if you place in your request on a Friday. Oftentimes this will not cover the whole fee, but it’s better than nothing.
BetOnline’s Products: What Can You Bet On or Play?
BetOnline is an”all in one” company. This means you can bet on sports betting, play poker and casino games.
Their longest reputation, and likely most popular product, is that their sportsbook. So let us start there.
Bet on Sports, Horses and Financials
BetOnline offers action on horses, sports and financing.
In their sportsbook they more or less cover the most popular sports in the US. Those include:
You can also bet on stocks and prop bets on these markets:
Canadian Football Cycling
Women’s Pro Basketball (WNBA)
Football One option they have added recently is eSports. It is no surprise really, given how fast the business is growing. Every bookmaker is leaping on the bandwagon and offering odds on each of the greatest tournaments and leagues.
BetOnline is, too, even though it appears as though they’re only dipping their toe in the water to check the temperature.
I say that because — as of right now — they just have moneyline odds for one match-up / league. Compare that to Bovada who’s covering 5+ matches around about 10+ leagues/tournaments.
It is a big difference. I mean, who would you rather go to for eSports gambling?
That being said, I think that it’s a good idea to provide BetOnline the benefit of the doubt…for now. It’s possible they’re still trying to find their bearings in this growing market. Maybe they have plans to enlarge their eSports choices in the near future.
What they do have going for them is that their chances on the match-up I’m comparing to Bovada. They’re offering marginally better pricing for the same exact match.
There’s no way to tell if that’s going to be the case, nor will it matter if they never enlarge this section of the sportsbook.
But, it’s reason enough to keep tabs on these.
They offer live betting too. These options change constantly, obviously, to coincide with what games or events are moving on. When I last looked they’d lines for soccer, baseball and tennis. You can even keep tabs on a couple games simultaneously utilizing their multi-event tab and program for future games with their live betting calendar.
1 thing they’re known for are their higher-than-average betting limits. These vary from $1 to $25,000. Most markets will max out at between $1,000 to $3,000. But it just depends. It is also possible to raise your wagering amounts by telephoning their Player Services.
Their sportsbook also runs a fair number of promotions, and much more than you’ll find in their own racebook and financials section combined. Some of the better options include:
50% Welcome Bonus — Get a 50% match on your initial deposit up to $2,500.50percent Kickoff Reload — Get a 50% reload bonus up to $1,000. Live Bet Free Play — Get a $25 free play. This is more or less insurance — create a bet and if you lose, they will reimburse you around $25.
Beyond that you’ll see a list of races in their webpage. Each listing tells you the number of spacious races there are, which should you click it will expand to show you the horses, races, jockeys and chances.
If you’re unfamiliar with their website or horse gambling, a good section to search through is their racebook information tab in their own navigation. Here you’ll find advice on:
Their monitor limits. This tells you that the maximum you can wager per race.Payoff odds. Discover how much you’ll make in case your wager (s) win.Their rules and the kinds of bets you can make.Horse betting tips, FAQs and terms (in case you don’t understand what a word or term means).
It’s a good section if you are new to horse gambling.
And that is about it. This segment is far smaller than their sportsbook.
Nevertheless, their racebook does have a couple offers also, though nowhere near the quality or quantity that their sportsbook offers.
Here are some of their offers:
Track Rebate — Get a 7% rebate on your stakes daily without a min volume or caps on how much you can earn. $25 Risk Free Bet — Create a bet for the very first time from the racebook. In the event you lose BetOnline will reimburse you around $25.
Last up is their financials section. Here you can bet on currencies, indices and commodities. Your betting options include signature, range, turbo and one touch. The assets/markets it is possible to wager on will depend on your bet kind.
This segment looks like an afterthought. It certainly will not get the focus or marketing BetOnline’s other segments do.
Their poker room is among the most well-known alternatives for Americans. They’re part of this Chico Poker Network, who’s 13th in total traffic rankings, but is 3rd for US poker sites. After I last checked they had around 2,100 players on their site.
In 2016 BetOnline performed a much-needed software upgrade. Previously they had several complaints about the quality of their applications. This included complaints about fuzzy graphics, poor sound and animation quality.
But following their update we have seen hints that they might have a few of the best applications in america market.
From worst to best at 1 update? That may be pushing it. But based on the pictures I’ve seen, their applications DOES look better.
However, there are still several places BetOnline can improve.
Right now they have a download for PC and Macs. However, they don’t have some options for cellular players, which we think is a no-brainer in this day and age. Additionally they only offer holdem, omaha and 7-card stud. It’d be wonderful to see more game options.
Overall, though, it’s nice to see they’re making improvements and are becoming more aggressive with what other high tier US poker sites provide.
Speaking of that, some of the poker promotions or offers include:
Welcome Bonus — They’ll match your deposit 100% up to a maximum of $2,500. They pay this out to you $5 at a time. You’ll have 60 days to clean the offer. $50,000 GTD — They’re operating a $50,000 guarantee for $99. $90,000 Guaranteed — BetOnline promises more than $90,000 in championship prize pools each and every weekend.
They’ve a few leaderboard and cash race challenges, also.
Plus it’s not just a”bonus,” but the games here should be milder because of the US traffic and also the crossover visitors from their sportsbook or casino. Earning money from their poker tables ought to be easier here in contrast to other poker (only) sites.
Casino and Skill Games
Here you will find a great deal of game choices which range from table games to slots to video poker and skill games. Their matches come from the Rival Gaming and BetSoft software, both of which are known for producing games that are topnotch. Here is the way their games breakdown:
9 blackjack variations.13 table games.19 regular slots also 37 3D slots.17 video poker games.Live dealers for blackjack, blackjack, roulette and baccarat.
Let’s get more specific however. Following is a small sample of this casino and ability games you can play at BetOnline. See our casino review for a complete list.
American Roulette Caribbean Stud Poker Multi-Hand Blackjack Three Card Poker American Blackjack 21 Burn Craps Baccarat Poker3 Heads Up Monkey Money (slots) Reel Outlaws (slots) Wizards Castle (slots) The Bees (slots) Ghouls Gold (slots, also a Three ??3 hold slot machine) It Came From Venus (3d slots) Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde (3d slots) Mr. Vegas (3d slots) RockStar (3d slots) Lost (3d slots) Five Draw Poker (video poker) All American (video poker) Double Bonus (video poker) Joker Poker (video poker) Deuces Wild (video poker)
Then there is their ability matches. These include favorites like:
And as you play their matches you can also clear bonuses, earn points and receive money back. Here are some of their top offers:
Slots Bonus — This can be a 100% match bonus up to $1,000 to use for your favourite slot games.Live Dealer Gamble — Perform your initial wager in the live dealer casino. Should you lose, BetOnline will reimburse you around $25. Reload Bonus — Get an additional 25% bonus each time you make a deposit of $25 or more.Rebate Program — Get a 10% rebate every single week you lose $100 or more.
You will want to read our casino inspection to find out about all their offers, in addition to their terms and conditions since they will be different for every game and offer you playwith. Customer Support
If you Encounter a problem or have a question, you can reach out to BetOnline using one of the following options:
LIVE CHAT (for actual money accounts only)
1 thing to point out here are the accounts I’ve seen about how BetOnline’s support is unfriendly.
One example came out of a poker player turned website reviewer. He shared his experience, which was among the worst I’ve heard , let alone heard about BetOnline.
Here’s an excerpt in Gambling the Odds:
Considering that BetOnline’s poker software is not high quality, I expected them to shine at customer services. How else could you explain the prevalence of the poker room?
Turns out I was wrong, big-time. In reality, through their live chat support (and I just need to mention it in this BetOnline review), I had the worst customer service experience in my life so far.
Following the live chat session began, I had to wait a couple of minutes until the customer service person bothered to answer, not just completely ignoring my question but asking for my username and password too. Would you feel comfortable entering your username and password to some live chat box? I sure did not.
I clarified that I do not wish to enter that information to a chat room and, what’s more, the query requires no such information because it was about BetOnline.ag generally. I had to wait ten more minutes for”help” (I use that word loosely here), while getting”Thanks for waiting. I will be with you in only a moment…” every now and then.
That said, I’ve also heard that the opposite. A reviewer who plays on BetOnline says they provide excellent customer services. In addition, he says that your very best bet is to benefit from the live chat (only available to account holders).
Their experiences are polar opposites. This implies to people that BetOnline might have inconsistencies with how they handle customer care…an
Read more: southernutahvolleyball.com
There are a couple of key differences between the Portland Trail Blazers and the just-covered Raptors, and very few of them offer aid for Rip City’s greater odds.
The Blazers were thin last year, buttressing a elite starting five with next to nothing off the bench. Bringing in Chris Kaman and Steve Blake doesn’t feel like a Fantastic remedy.
Obviously, second-year guard C.J. McCollum needs to see his role increase this year, and he’s got the combo-guard skills to produce an impact. Head coach Terry Stotts is apparently leaning toward him as a first man; McCollum directed all Blazers reserves in minutes per game during the preseason.
For all that, it is hard to grasp why Portland is viewed as a bigger name hazard than Toronto. The Blazers’ conference is harder, their bench is still thinner and they finished the year at just 23-19 following a red-hot start. Portland is a good group, but it might not be more than that.
It’ll be around Damian Lillard, LaMarcus Aldridge and the rest of the starters to duplicate that fifth-ranked offensive rating. If they can’t do that, suspect defense and an underwhelming chair may finally hit among last year’s biggest surprises with a painful dose of reality.
Read more: mnvolleyballhq.com
Bellator president Scott Coker proceeded on Ariel Helwani’s ESPN MMA Show on Monday and disclosed that his marketing is thinking about conducting a 16-man featherweight grand prix tournament. According to Coker, the tournament will start operating in October and will feature 16 of their best featherweights in Bellator, including fighters in the division as well as bantamweights moving up and potentially even lightweights moving down. The featherweight championship follows in the footsteps of this advertising’s heavyweight grand prix, which just saw Ryan Bader crowned winner, and also the welterweight tournament, which is still ongoing.
Coker told Helwani he needs the first round of eight fights in the championship to take place on one night or on back-to-back nights at the autumn. In addition, he said he needs the tournament to complete within a calendar year, which practically mirrors the heavyweight and welterweight championship timelines.
As far as who will be among the 16 fighters at the tournament, so far no one has been announced, but Coker did state he desires Bellator featherweight champion Patricio”Pitbull” Freire for part of the championship game. Pitbull is shooting on Michael Chandler in May for the Bellator lightweight title, so if he does participate in the championship he’ll be the champion, meaning that his belt will be on the line in every round of the tournament just like Rory MacDonald’s welterweight name is online each time he fights.
As far as some other featherweights who are predicted to be in the tournament, here are a few who appear to be near locks: Rising prospect AJ McKee; top contender Henry Corrales; former champ Daniel Straus; former champ Pat Curran; former top prospect Aaron Pico; former title competition Emmanuel Sanchez; and former UFC fighter Sam Sicilia.
The fact there are not 16 featherweights ways that bantamweights are also encouraged to move up, and Coker said that James Gallagher and Darrion Caldwell will be asked to take part in the championship. I would also anticipate Ricky Bandejas and Juan Archuleta to be asked, as well. So far as lightweights proceed, there might potentially be a couple of fighters who could create the cut down a weight class involving Derek Campos, who just fought at featherweight in his final struggle, and Ryan Scope, who only lost a close fight against Patricky”Pitbull” Freire.
It is exciting to see Bellator continue to maintain these tournaments as the game of MMA was build on the tournament format. The advertising’s bedrock back at the Bjorn Rebney days was the championships but when Coker initially came in they began to go out in trade for superfights and legends fights. But it seems like Coker, Bellator, Paramount and DAZN adore the tournaments since it is the third one the promotion will be running within the last couple of years. Now, you need to wonder what another tournament for Bellator is, and when I had to guess that it would be something in the women’s divisions. For now, though, featherweight is getting a fantastic pair of fights.
Disclaimer: This page includes affiliate links and MMA Odds Breaker is going to be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking on the links.
Read more: allcitynewsonline.com
As the UFC pushes Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) to the mainstream, an age old question remains: Is MMA safer then boxing? The main premise behind the argument has always been that unlike boxing, in MMA, there are more avenues to success compared to hitting your opponent. Highlighting the apparent, you will find less painful routes to victory, therefore making some losses in MMA less damaging on a fighter’s body and brain. The Unified Rules of MMA make it feasible for an MMA fighter to win a bout by judges’ choice or by maybe submitting their opponent. The resulting idea is that MMA athletes suffer fewer traumatic injuries and the odds are lessened they may become punch drunk. But, proponents of boxing are always quick to point out the bigger gloves employed in MMA and the fact the rules allowing for leg strikes and elbows. Therefore”it is time” to take an in-depth appearance to either side of the argument. Prior to getting into the thick of the debate, I’d like to highlight one of the key reasons I decided to write this report. Shawn O’Sullivan, a retired boxer who I have met many occasions, resides in my hometown. On paper, his life seems like a success story. However the actual truth is his boxing career killed his odds of having a successful life after his career was finished. A brief documentary on his story are available below.Many would believe O’Sullivan’s career marginally illustrious as he was the 1981 World Amateur Champion, 1981 Canadian Athlete of the Year and 1984 Olympic Silver medalist at light middleweight. Also many believe his gold medal bout against Frank Tate very controversial as it appeared like the fix was in. Despite scoring two standing 8 counts in round two the judges given that round to Tate. Upon going pro, he found himself fast retired in 1988 with failed comebacks in both 1991 and 1997. Shawn’s overall listing of 23-5-0, with 16 knockouts handed him without accomplishing his dreams of competing in a world title bout. After four more fights in 1997, a neurologist refused to renew the license he needed to continue boxing because of brain injury that he saw during a CAT scan. Now, O’Sullivan is living with the issues of brain damage, but he does not repent his career in boxing. Throughout my many discussions with O’Sullivan, he practically always slurred his speech also had problems recalling parts of his life. Regrettably, his ability to share his story is all he has to show for his illustrious career. But, that is hindered as a result of the culmination of blows to the head he suffered during his boxing career. O’Sullivan suffers from fighter’s dementia, commonly called being”punch drunk” caused partly as a result of the fighting style and gruelling sparring sessions at the gym. If you want to find out what I mean, take a few minutes and see his bout against Armando Martinez. What remains untold to most, and something which highlights the relevance of the article is that O’Sullivan was pushed into boxing with his first trainer: his father. Rumors are his father was letting his son spar against heavyweights and even larger guys as part of the daily reality test for O’Sullivan. As parents, one may feel uncomfortable recommending that your child partake in any battle sport from the fear of their long-term consequences. Therefore signing up your child to boxing or MMA training could become a question of which is safer? Is there a possibility that you could help select the lesser of two so-called evils. Until recently the entire argument behind MMA is safer then Boxing was entirely theoretical. There continues to be little scientific facts and findings to support the claim. Most recently the University of Alberta’s Dr. Shelby Karpman headed a review of over a decade’s worth of medical exams from approximately 1,700 fighters in Edmonton, Canada. According to the study, Fifty-nine per cent of MMA athletes lasted some form of harm, compared to 50 percent of fighters. But, fighters were likely to eliminate consciousness in a bout: seven per cent versus four per cent for MMA fighters. Regardless of the facts to as which sport is safer, The Canadian Medical Association has called for a ban on both MMA and boxing. By highlighting a 2014 University of Toronto study revealed an MMA fighter suffered a traumatic brain injury at almost a third of professional bouts. It’s not my aim to cast doubt onto the safety of a game, however both boxing and MMA have experienced instances of fatalities which are well documented. Recently a MMA fighter died because of complications cutting weight. John McCain, who once labeled the sport of MMA”human cockfighting,” sat ringside in the 1995 boxing death of Jimmy Garcia. But, very few severe life threatening injuries in MMA come into mind because no one have happened on its main point. A fighter’s passing inside the Octagon has never occurred and it never will. Nonetheless, it’s something which has to be in the back of everyone’s mind when we see fighters getting knocked out lifelessly. Rendering an opponent not just defenceless but unconscious remains to be the title of the fight game whether it be MMA or Boxing. That is where a fighter’s fanfare, bonus cash and constant hype derives. UFC President Dana White announced MMA the”safest game in the world, fact.” The concept that MMA is the most popular sport in the entire world is mad. Tennis, golf, track and field, swimming… Are all”safer” sports in that they lack head trauma all together and pose little risk of death. Touting up safety should come with a responsibility to completely study the ramifications of your sport. The construction on what will be called the UFC Athlete Health and Performance Center starts this shortly and will take 15 weeks to complete. Next to medical insurance for training injuries, this is MMA’s second most significant step towards taking on more of a top role in sport safety. With that said, Dana’s end game is that Scientific research will eventually brand MMA as a”safer” choice for fight sport athletes when compared with boxing. But, it might just further the sport’s reverse relationship. Since MMA increases in popularity, boxing’s visibility at the national understanding continues to fall and it’s simple to finger point. Additionally, it can not be stressed enough the first generation of fighters are only getting out of this sport within the last few years. Science has a remarkably small sample dimension to look at in terms of aging MMA fighters at this time, though UFC originals like Gary Goodridge are already feeling the consequences. We probably still require a few more”generations” of fighters to retire and grow older to get a true sense of the effects of the game on them since they age. And by that I mean boxers that have had to compete with other high level athletes, not boxers who were the very best of a sport that was very much in the developmental phases. Fighters like George St Pierre, Demetrious Johnson and Ronda Rousey are not likely to face any longstanding consequences of brain injury primarily due to their runs of desire as well as their capacity to avoid significant harm. Johnson recently stated on the Joe Rogan Experience that”There is not enough money in the world for me to risk brain damage” Johnson, like many other educated fighters, knows that taking too much damage in his profession will harm his longevity both indoors and outside the sport, and that is why he is so conscious of his security in the Octagon. Perhaps that’s the main reason he’s never lost consciousness from the Octagon. Whatever the scenario, it is difficult to utilize findings of yesteryear to find out the safety of the game now. So much always changes inside the sport of MMA that trying to compare between eras is essentially the exact same in attempting to compare very different sports. Perhaps then a better approach isn’t to look at the sport’s past, and rather on its present and foreseeable future. The argument about which game is safer due to the glove size is moot. The amount of punishment a fighter takes over their livelihood is individualistic and highly dependent on a fighter’s style. The main selling point as to why MMA is more powerful than boxing is truly the glove dimensions. The boxing glove has been created to protect the hands, not the individual being punched. However MMA practitioners argue that they utilize the bare minimum in hand defense. Any debate surrounding the fact that a hand will crack until the mind is not the most attractive approach to advocate for a safer sport. The same goes for the standing eight count. Arguing that allowing a concussed fighter to continue at a fight after being pumped only furthers brain injury. In MMA we witness that a lot follow up punches following a fighter is rendered unconscious — maybe equally damaging to allowing a boxer to continue after receiving devastating blows. There are many factors in determining the devastation of a landed punch–out of technique to time, to whether or not the receiver saw the punch coming–that it would be almost impossible to determine in a live match which glove size would have caused the maximum harm. What’s more, there are quite a few different elements and rules that deciding on which game is safer. The normal duration of a Boxing game is normally longer then that of an MMA fight. There are so many factors that are individualistic to the fighter. I’d love to announce each sport equally as harmful, but until further research is completed, an individual can not create such a statement with much confidence. The inherent risks in both sports are intrinsically connected. The ability of a fighter to achieve longevity in the sport is more dependant on the skills of the fighter themselves their respective sports parameters alone. Generalizing that is safer without the scientific proof to support such a claim remains a matter of opinion.
Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links and MMA Odds Breaker will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking on the links.
Read more: sportxmagazine.com
Chad Mendes was left without an opponent. Initially reported by Sherdog.com, Clay Guida has an injury that has forced him to pull from his forthcoming UFC on FOX 7 matchup against Mendes, that was set to take place April 20 at HP Pavilion at San Jose, Calif.. It is the third opponent to pull from conflicts with Mendes in the past elections, following Hacran Dias was scratched with an injury at UFC on FX 6 and Manny Gamburyan pulled from his UFC 157 game with Mendes after he was hurt in practice. Mendes (13-1) is among the top-five featherweights in the world according to the MMA Fighter Rankings. He’s an amazing wrestler with KO power, and since dropping to UFC featherweight champion Jose Aldo at UFC 142, he’s bounced back with KO wins Cody McKenzie and Yaotzin Meza to reaffirm his place as a leading featherweight. No clue yet on who’ll replace Mendes, however it is potential Frankie Edgar, Cub Swanson, or Dennis Siver requires his place, although it’s probably if that’s the case Mendes will be shifted to a later card. Formiga vs. Cariaso set for UFC on FX 8 A conflict between top-ranked flyweights is set to go down this May in Brazil, since the UFC has included a matchup between Jussier Formiga and Chris Cariaso into the forthcoming UFC on FX 8 card. TATAME.com was the first to break news of this bout. Formiga (14-2) is coming off a TKO reduction in his UFC debut to high rival John Dodson, while Cariaso (14-4) lost via entry to John Moraga at UFC 155, but both fighters are extremely talented and a win over a another puts them straight back into the flyweight title picture. This is a pretty close fight, so expect the MMA odds to be competitive when they are released. I’d guess that Formiga would be a tiny favorite over Cariaso, who, while talented, does not possess the hype behind him that Formiga does. UFC Sweden 2 adds Cella vs. Troeng The UFC added a fight between TUF 17 middleweights to the coming UFC Sweden 2 card, as Swede Tor Troeng takes on American Adam Cella in the April 6 event scheduled to occur at Ericsson Globe Arena in Stockholm. MMAnytt.se first reported that the bout, which will will indicate the official UFC debut of both fighters. Troeng (15-4-1) and also Cella (4-0) were both eliminated from TUF 17 after being knocked out on the series, Cella’s reduction being the barbarous spinning hook kick KO from Uriah Hall. With Troeng fighting before his hometown crowd and Cella come off one of the worst KOs in recent memory, anticipate Troeng to open as a solid -200 favorite, while Cella will be the underdog, and is definitely somebody that you shouldn’t put your cash on.
Read more: crossfitinception.com
The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) was in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for the eight time in promotional history last Saturday (June 3, 2017) using UFC 212: Aldo vs. Holloway. It was a solid night of bits that saw nine of 12 bouts ending inside the distance, and with all the fights currently in our rear perspective, let’s look at some potential matchups featuring a few of the opponents from the evening…
Max Holloway vs. Frankie Edgar
Holloway dethroned Jose Aldo to turn into new king at 145 pounds, and for his first official title defense, I think it would make most sense for him to carry on Frankie Edgar, as that is a matchup fight fans have been wanting to see for a while today. The other potential candidate for a title shot in Cub Swanson, but his last loss came at the hands of Holloway in a really critical fashion. That’s not a battle that peaks the interest of fight fans, as Holloway will be anticipated to be a massive favorite. The Edgar fight is one in so everybody would like to see it. I believe this potential featherweight title would are a great fit to main event UFC 216 in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Claudia Gadelha vs. Rose Namajunas
Gadelha made brief work of Poland’s Karolina Kowalkiewicz, beating her from rear-naked choke submission from the very first form of activity. She now enjoys a two-fight winning streak, also for her next outing inside the Octagon, I want to see her take on Namajunas at a title eliminator. Both fighters earned quick victories in their most recent bouts, so I want to see them create a fast turnaround to co-main event August’s UFC Fight Night in Mexico City.
Brian Kelleher vs. Bryan Caraway
Kelleher gained a first-round guillotine-choke submission over veteran Iuri Alcantara in what was a picture perfect promotional debut for its 30-year-old, who employed his post-fight speech to ask for a Top 10 ranked opponent for a quick turnaround on the upcoming Long Island card in July. I believe an opponent that makes sense is Caraway, that has not seen action since a split decision win over Aljamain Sterling just over one year ago. I believe this is a pairing which is reasonable for both fighters and are a good fit anywhere on the Long Island card.
Disclaimer: This page contains affiliate links and MMA Odds Breaker will be paid if you make a purchase after clicking on the links.
Read more: sportsinfotrack.com
Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) has 21 forthcoming event(s), with the next one to be held in Golden 1 Center, Sacramento, California, United States. To date, Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) has held 486 events and presided over about 5,211 matches.
UPCOMING EVENTSRECENT EVENTS
DATE FIGHT TITLE LOCATION
2019 UFC Fight Night 155 – De Randamie vs. Ladd country Golden 1 Center, Sacramento, California, United States of America JUL
2019 UFC on ESPN 4 – Dos Anjos vs. Edwards nation AT&T Center, San Antonio, Texas, United States JUL
2019 UFC 240 – Holloway vs. Edgar country Rogers Place, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
2019 UFC on ESPN 5 – Covington vs. Lawler nation Prudential Center, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America AUG
2019 UFC Fight Night 156 – Shevchenko vs. Carmouche 2 country Antel Arena, Montevideo, Uruguay
2019 UFC 241 – Cormier vs. Miocic 2 country Honda Center, Anaheim, California, United States of America AUG
2019 UFC Fight Night 157 – Andrade vs. Zhang country Shenzhen Universiade Sports Centre, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
2019 UFC 242 – Khabib vs. Poirier nation TBA, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
2019 UFC Fight Night 158 – TBA country Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2019 UFC Fight Night 159 – TBA country Mexico City Arena, Mexico City, Mexico
2019 UFC Fight Night 160 – TBA nation Royal Arena, Copenhagen OCT
2019 UFC 243 – TBA nation Docklands Stadium, Melbourne OCT
2019 UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ – TBA country TBA
2019 UFC Fight Night on ESPN2 – TBA country TBA
2019 UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ – TBA country TBA
2019 UFC 244 – TBA country TBA
2019 UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ – TBA country TBA
2019 UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ – TBA country TBA
2019 UFC Fight Night on ESPN – TBA nation TBA
2019 UFC 245 – TBA nation TBA
2019 UFC Fight Night on ESPN+ – TBA nation TBA
Read more: adamssportsblog.com
For the first time since 2016, the UFC heads to Atlanta, Georgia, since the Octagon will be Put up in State Farm Arena for UFC 236: Holloway vs Poirier II.
The featherweight champion, Max”Blessed” Holloway, is moving up to struggle for its interim lightweight name and is a -205 favourite. Meanwhile, Dustin”The Diamond” Poirier beat Holloway in 2012 but is a +165 underdog.
Also on this card is a interim middleweight title match involving Israel”The Last Stylebender” Adesanya (-185) and Kelvin Gastelum (+150). I’ve a breakdown and select for each fight on the primary card.
Max Holloway has won 13 straight fights, 10 of which were finishes.
Dustin Poirier is 8-1-1 in his last 10 fights, with six wins by knockout.
Max Holloway averages 6.9 significant strikes per minute.
Holloway vs Poirier II Fight Center
Scott Hastings’ 2019 Prediction Record To Date
Straight Up Picking Favorites Picking Underdogs
34-23 32-17 2-6
Max Holloway vs Dustin Poirier
Holloway (-205) is seeking to expand his 13-fight winning series in his new division as he moves upward from featherweight to lightweight. During the streak, 10 fights were endings, nine by knockout and one by submission. Overall, the Hawaii native has a list of 20-3 with 10 wins coming by knockout.
The 27-year-old is that the definition of a brawler, becoming in his opponents’ faces and placing on a pace that’s unmatched at the UFC. Holloway has incredible hand speed and always peppers his foes with strikes until they wilt under his stress. Blessed averages 6.9 significant strikes per minute, and it has landed 100 or more substantial strikes in four of the last five fights, such as 307 against Brian Ortega in UFC 231.
Poirier (+165) has finally earned his title fight after eight years in the UFC, where he has a 16-4-1 record, and is unbeaten in his last five scraps. The Louisiana native has been close to title fights previously but would seemingly always lose to prospective challengers. After three straight knockout wins, however, he has set himself in line for the interim lightweight strap.
Much like his counterpart, the Diamond loves to get into wild, high-octane scraps. The 30-year-old is a very technically solid striker, rarely putting himself in much risk by keeping his shield high, and contains great footwork while landing an average of 5.59 significant strikes per minute. Additionally, he does possess a wrestling pedigree also and averages 1.75 takedowns per 15 minutes, but typically he retains the fights standing.
It is unfortunate we must wait until the conclusion of the card to watch this potential war but it’ll be well worth it. Holloway absorbs strikes but only walks right through the cries and seems completely unfazed while he swarms his foes until they crumble. Meanwhile, Poirier is likely better but I don’t know if he will have the ability to create much distance for some living space. Poirier conquer Holloway in Blessed’s Octagon debut in 2012 by first-round submission. I expect a different result this time around.
Read more: royalrumble-wwe.com
When fighters are given their discharge from a major North American MMA promotion like the UFC or Bellator — unless they’re a major star — they frequently fall into obscurity on the regional/overseas circuit unless they stand up a couple of wins and end up registering with one of the above promotions. In this regular feature for MMAOddsBreaker.com, I take a peek at a few regional/overseas MMA matchups for the month of February and rather than listing off the best fights outside these significant organizations, I highlight some familiar names which you might recognize on upcoming struggle cards.
LFA 59 — Feb. 1 (Phoenix, Arizona)
David Michaud (14-4) vs. Christian Aguilera (11-5)
Former UFC lightweight Michaud seems to make it four straight wins when he faces Aguilera. Since he was released from the UFC in 2015, Michaud has gone 6-2 including a TKO win over Fernando Gonzalez Trevino in October. Aguilera meanwhile had his three-fight win streak snapped in his last bout as he lost a decision to Matthew Frincu in LFA 44. Aguilera will seem to avoid back-to-back losses for the first time since Mar. 2016. Editor’s note: Michaud defeated Aguilera through TKO at 4:14 of the first round.
TKO 46 — Feb. 8 (Quebec City, QC) — Matchup Moved To April
Jesse Ronson (20-8) vs. Charles Jourdain (8-1)
UFC veteran Ronson defends his lightweight title against current featherweight champion Jourdain. Ronson almost had a second stint in the UFC back in December as he took a short notice struggle against Diego Ferreira. However the comission said he’d be cutting too much weight along with his UFC contract was recinded. The 33-year-old has won five-straight struggles. Jourdain meanwhile won the featherweight title beating Alex Morgan by first-round submission at TKO 45 in December. He’s won three-straight struggles.
Cagesport 55 — Feb. 9 (Tacoma, Washington)
Anthony Hamilton (17-9) vs. Jared Torgeson (18-19) — Heavyweight name Former UFC heavyweight Hamilton aims to ensure it is three-straight wins when he faces Torgeson. The 38-year-old is coming from a unanimous decision win over Dylan Potter at Dominate FC two in September. Torgeson meanwhile has lost five of his last six fights. Editor’s note: Hamilton defeated Torgeson via three-round unanimous decision.
ACA 92: Poland — Feb. 15 (Warsaw, Poland)
Marcin Held (25-7) vs. Abdul-Aziz Abdulvakhabov (15-2)
UFC veteran Held faces Abdulvakhabov in a lightweight bout. Held abandoned the UFC after beating Nasrat Haqparast in UFC Fight Night 118 and has won back fights. Abdulvakhabov meanwhile is coming from a majority decision loss to Ali Bagov in ACB 89 at Aug, which snapped his 14-fight win streak.
Daniel Omiela??czuk (20-9-1) vs. Zelimkhan Umiev (11-2)
Former UFC light heavyweight Omielanczuk seems to avoid back-to-back losses when he faces Umiev. Omielanczuk dropped three straight fights in the UFC into Stefan Struve, Tim Johnson and Curtis Blaydes until he was released in late 2017. Umiev meanwhile had his own six-fight win streak snapped as he was completed in the first round by Evgeny Goncharov at WFCA 50 in August.
Luke Barnatt (14-6) vs. Jorge Gonzales (14-3)
UFC veteran Barnatt maintains in his third consecutive fight in the light heavyweight division when he faces Gonzalez. The 30-year-old is coming from a majority decision loss to Karol Celi??ski at ACB 88 which fell him to 2-2 in his last four fights. Gonzalez meanwhile heads into this fight on a five-fight win streak.
Efrain Escudero (30-14) vs. Amirkhan Adaev (14-4)
TUF 8 champion Escudero seems to prevent back-to-back losses for the first time since Apr. 2016 when he faces Adev. Escudaro last competed on the Golden Boy MMA card at which he chose to fellow UFC veteran Gleison Tibau. Adaev meanwhile has won three-straight and five of the last six full heading into this fight.
Invicta FC 34 — Feb. 15 (Kansas City, Kansas)
Pearl Gonzalez (9-3) vs. Vanessa Porto (20-8) — Flyweight Title
Former UFC strawweight Gonzalez faces Porto for the flyweight title in the main event of Invicta FC 34. The 32-year-old has remained undefeated because she was discharged from the UFC in late 2017, going 3-0 with Invicta. Porto has won back-to-back fights however hasn’t fought since Jan. 2018.
Milana Dudieva (12-7) vs. Karina Rodriguez (6-3)
UFC veteran Dudieva looks to make it two-straight wins for the first time since Aug. 2014 when she confronts short-notice replacement Rodriguez. Dudieva is coming from a TKO win over TUF 26’s Christina Marks at Invicta FC 28 which snapped her four-fight losing series. Rodriguez meanwhile replaces Brogan Walker-Sanchez and looks to rebound from her split decision loss to DeAnna Bennett in Invicta FC 28
DeAnna Bennett (9-4-1) vs. Miranda Maverick (4-1)
TUF 26’s Bennett seems to get back on the winning track against Maverick in a flyweight bout. The 34-year-old is coming off a loss to Women’s MMA leader Kelly Kobold in Tuff-N-Uff in September. Maverick meanwhile has won four of her last five fights with her lone setback coming from Brogan Walker-Sanchez in Invicta FC 30 where she endured a split decision loss.
War at the Rock — Feb 16 (Hollywood, Florida)
Michel Quinones (8-3) vs. Yosdenis Cedeno (11-6-1)
A set of UFC veterans struggle at a featherweight bout as Quinones faces Cedeno. Quinones went 0-2 in the UFC with losses to Jared Gordon and Sage Northcutt. The 34-year-old fights for the very first since Nov. 2017. Cedeno meanwhile looks for two-straight wins for the first time since Oct. 2013 and is coming off a unanimous decision win over Pedro Gomes at Underground Cage Fighting Championship 1 in July.
Is there a noteworthy MMA veteran rival this month which I missed? Or is there a matchup that’s been altered? Hit me up on Twitter @LynchOnSports, and I will add it in or fix this up. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This page includes affiliate links and MMA Odds Breaker is going to be paid if you make a purchase after clicking on the hyperlinks.
Read more: truesportrealtalk.com
Parlay odds can find a bit confusing when compute the payout of matches or you’re trying to unite odds. With our parlay calculator, you can choose how you want your odds exhibited (American, Fractional or Decimal), enter up to 100 stakes on one slip, and our calculator will ascertain how much you’ll win depending upon your wager amount. This instrument is simple to use, and supplies your projected odds before you head to a sportsbook to place your parlay bet to you.
Read more: demarcomurray.org